|
|
Post by BlazeHedgehod on Jun 11, 2005 13:18:57 GMT -5
In a sense, though, Halo is already CG, so what personality is there to lose?
|
|
|
|
Post by OgtraX on Jun 11, 2005 13:22:29 GMT -5
A movie isn't as interactive as a game. In a game you can feel the character more than in a movie. Since a movie isn't as interactive as a game , the characters need more personality to capture the viewer.
|
|
|
|
Post by Evan on Jun 12, 2005 10:54:45 GMT -5
I really do have to give credit to Microsoft for their "Halo bible" they have to follow. I've been waiting for a movie based on a game that, y'know, ACTUALLY WAS ADAPTED FROM THE FRICKING GAMES.
We all saw what happened with the SMB movie...
|
|
Sofox
Behind The Logo Team 
Yeah, I'm still a jet propelled fox, deal with it
Posts: 1,273
|
Post by Sofox on Jun 12, 2005 15:34:06 GMT -5
|
|
Artemus
Behind The Logo Team
So what if it's a different picture, still SSBB-related
Posts: 2,155
|
Post by Artemus on Jun 12, 2005 15:50:09 GMT -5
Honestly.
|
|
|
|
Post by NeroKid on Jun 13, 2005 2:26:17 GMT -5
I'd like a movie where the CGI is actually realistic.
"But then how would the audience know how much money you've spent on awexome CGI?"
get back to doing toy comercials, Spielberg.
anyway, I'll take another Resident Evil 1 movie. Where the movie isn't so much a literal adaptation of the game, but rather an adaptation of what the game would be if it didn't feel the need to fit in game play mechanics (overlooking the stupid dogs and licker scenes). while functioning as a side-story to the videogames themself.
In terms of content, I think a Halo movie would be nice if they kind fo crossed what Final Fantasy: Spirits Within should have been (ie: not boring!) with what Starship Troopers should have been. (ie: not retarded!)
|
|
